- #GRAPHIC CARD BENCHMARK CHECKER HOW TO#
- #GRAPHIC CARD BENCHMARK CHECKER 1080P#
- #GRAPHIC CARD BENCHMARK CHECKER DRIVER#
- #GRAPHIC CARD BENCHMARK CHECKER PC#
And when we say "highest," we mean it, because instead of calling it Very High or Ultra, the highest preset graphics setting in Shadow of the Tomb Raider is literally called "Highest."Īfter configuring Shadow of the Tomb Raider to run at the Highest setting, we make sure DirectX 12 is enabled, and then we run the in-game benchmark (found in the Display and Graphics menu) at three full-screen resolutions: 1,920 by 1,080 (FHD 1080p), 2,560 by 1,440 (QHD 1440p), and 3,840 by 2,160 (UHD 4K). On PC, it's pretty demanding, too, with publisher Square Enix recommending at least an Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 to achieve playable frame rates at the highest settings. Though the game released to mixed reception when it came out in September 2018, critics all agreed that Shadow of the Tomb Raider (Opens in a new window) is a visual stunner. Most employ a built-in benchmark sequence provided by the game developer, but in a few cases where indicated, we have developed a custom run.
Let's get into those next.Īll of our AAA game tests are reported in average frames per second, except where indicated. We record and report the average frame rate at each of the three presets we use.Īfter Superposition is complete, we move on to a long sequence of games accessed via Steam, Uplay, or the Epic Games launcher, depending on the title. Superposition generates a points-based score after the conclusion of each sequence, along with minimum, maximum, and average frame rates.
#GRAPHIC CARD BENCHMARK CHECKER 1080P#
We use three of these: 1080p Extreme, 4K Optimized, and 8K Optimized. The Superposition testing utility comes with a variety of presets, which each govern both the resolution the test is run at and the level of detail. Fire Strike Ultra doesn't require a 4K monitor to run, but it does call for a graphics card with at least 3GB of video memory (VRAM). The 3DMark Fire Strike Ultra subtest is the first test we run when testing graphics cards at PCMag, and it's meant for stressing graphics muscle at a simulated resolution of 4K (3,840 by 2,160 pixels). Our core selection of synthetic benchmarking tools is headlined by the seminal 3DMark (Opens in a new window), branded by its developer as "The Gamer's Benchmark." Developed by Underwriters' Labs (UL), 3DMark is host to a suite of graphics subtests designed for different classes of graphics cards.
#GRAPHIC CARD BENCHMARK CHECKER DRIVER#
Windows 10 is always patched to the most recent version, and we use the latest compatible version of the graphics driver recommended by the card maker for the card being tested. We use this testbed to run a variety of synthetic tests (which simulate graphical stresses or game processes), as well as actual in-game benchmarks that report results in frame rates or game-specific scores. The 2020 version of this machine is equipped with an Asus ROG Maximus XII Hero Wi-Fi (Opens in a new window) motherboard, an Intel Core i9-10900K CPU, 16GB of G.Skill TridentZ RAM, a 2TB Samsung SSD 870 QVO SSD, and a Thermaltake Toughpower Grand 1,050-watt power supply (PSU).
#GRAPHIC CARD BENCHMARK CHECKER PC#
Other benchmarking tools are found inside of leading, AAA-grade video game titles you may recognize, put into place by their respective developers.Īll graphics cards that come through the PCMag offices are tested on a custom Windows 10 desktop PC we built expressly for the purpose of putting GPUs through their paces. For that reason, we use a variety of standardized benchmarks to test video cards, some of which were developed for the sole purpose of pushing discrete graphics components to their limits.
With so many graphics cards to choose from, we have to ensure that our testing regimen remains consistent with each one that we review. Here at PCMag, we run the numbers on every graphics card we get our hands on to determine which models are the most capable.
#GRAPHIC CARD BENCHMARK CHECKER HOW TO#
How to Set Up Two-Factor Authentication.
0 kommentar(er)
